If what we want is to have a Windows virtual machine, and always from my personal experience, I think VirtualBox is more reliable.Īnd how does GNOME Boxes work? Well, as it has been created by GNOME and its philosophy, it is like a one way road with no possibility of losing it. Having explained the above, and from my personal experience, I would recommend using GNOME Boxes to start Live Sessions without having to create a Live USB, as long as the computer has the necessary resources, or to create distribution virtual machines Linux. That's something that doesn't happen, or doesn't happen to me, in GNOME Boxes. If everything isn't working together, a virtual machine may stop working. GNOME Boxes behaves better for Linux distros VirtualBox seems more reliable for WindowsĪlso, when we use VirtualBox it also installs a package for us to make the software compatible with the kernel, and this package is updated every time VirtualBox is updated. 1 GNOME Boxes behaves better for Linux distros VirtualBox seems more reliable for Windows.They can produce something to improve that aspect slightly. You do get something called host profiles, which they've also improved slightly, however, I still think it's a bit clunky in terms of the way you can manage it. That's caused a number of issues already. That's one of the key things that I need really, from a support perspective. I would say for me personally, the management aspect with large memory and in-memory databases for the motions and stuff like that is what it needs. We are always sort of one or two versions behind. That's a big pain point that the firmware management of the underlying hardware should handle. VMware doesn't really cater to it, however, Nutanix to some degree does cater for.
That said, one of the problems is that when we're sort of behind big memory servers and the databases in them if you migrate it, it potentially breaks the system off. If you have to do firmware upgrades, it's organizing downtime and all sorts of things, which normally in a VMS space isn't an issue. They have embedded some of this in 7.1, however, I haven't tested it or seen it in action as yet. It's an in-memory database and that can sometimes cause issues. The biggest thing is the firmware upgrades and other items at the backend. The biggest pain point is probably the firmware management of the underlying hardware.
0 kommentar(er)
